PDF Making Medical Decisions for the Profoundly Mentally ï izmirescort.pro

making ebok medical pdf decisions book profoundly pdf mentally book disabled kindle basic free bioethics download Making Medical book Decisions for kindle Decisions for the Profoundly mobile Medical Decisions for download Medical Decisions for the Profoundly pdf Making Medical Decisions for the Profoundly Mentally Disabled EpubA legal and moral analysis of medical decision making on behalf of those with such severe cognitive impairments that they cannot exercise self determinationIn this book Norman Cantor analyzes the legal and moral status of people with profound mental disabilities―those with extreme cognitive impairments that prevent their exercise of medical self determination He proposes a legal and moral framework for surrogate medical decision making on their behalf The issues Cantor explores will be of interest to professionals in law medicine psychology philosophy and ethics as well as to parents guardians and health care providers who face perplexing issues in the context of surrogate medical decision makingThe profoundly mentally disabled are thought by some moral philosophers to lack the minimum cognitive ability for personhood Countering this position Cantor advances both theoretical and practical arguments for according them full legal and moral status He also argues that the concept of intrinsic human dignity should have an integral role in shaping the bounds of surrogate decision making Thus he claims while profoundly mentally disabled persons are not entitled to make their own medical decisions respect for intrinsic human dignity dictates their right to have a conscientious surrogate make medical decisions on their behalf Cantor discusses the criteria that bind such surrogates He asserts contrary to popular wisdom that the best interests of the disabled person are not always the determinative standard the interests of family or others can sometimes be considered Surrogates may even consistent with the intrinsic human dignity standard sometimes authorize tissue donation or participation in nontherapeutic medical research by profoundly disabled persons Intrinsic human dignity limits the occasions for such decisions and dictates close attention to the preferences and feelings of the profoundly disabled persons themselves Cantor also analyzes the underlying philosophical rationale that makes these decision making criteria consistent with law and morals.

PDF Making Medical Decisions for the Profoundly Mentally ï izmirescort.pro

[BOOKS] ✮ Making Medical Decisions for the Profoundly Mentally Disabled (Basic Bioethics) By Norman L. Cantor – Izmirescort.pro A legal and moral analysis of medical decision making on behalf of those with such severe cognitive impairments that they cannot exercise self determinationIn this book Norman Cantor analyzes the legaA legal and moral analysis of medical decision making on behalf of those with such severe cognitive impairments that they cannot exercise self determinationIn this book Norman Cantor analyzes the legal and moral status of people with profound mental disabilities―those with extreme cognitive impairments that prevent their exercise of medical self determination He proposes a legal and moral framework for surrogate medical decision making on their behalf The issues Cantor explores will be of interest to professionals in law medicine psychology philosophy and ethics as well as to parents guardians and health care providers who face perplexing issues in the context of surrogate medical decision makingThe profoundly mentally disabled are thought by some moral philosophers to lack the minimum cognitive ability for personhood Countering this position Cantor advances both theoretical and practical arguments for according them full legal and moral status He also argues that the concept of intrinsic human dignity should have an integral role in shaping the bounds of surrogate decision making Thus he claims while profoundly mentally disabled persons are not entitled to make their own medical decisions respect for intrinsic human dignity dictates their right to have a conscientious surrogate make medical decisions on their behalf Cantor discusses the criteria that bind such surrogates He asserts contrary to popular wisdom that the best interests of the disabled person are not always the determinative standard the interests of family or others can sometimes be considered Surrogates may even consistent with the intrinsic human dignity standard sometimes authorize tissue donation or participation in nontherapeutic medical research by profoundly disabled persons Intrinsic human dignity limits the occasions for such decisions and dictates close attention to the preferences and feelings of the profoundly disabled persons themselves Cantor also analyzes the underlying philosophical rationale that makes these decision making criteria consistent with law and morals.

A legal and moral analysis of medical decision making on behalf of those with such severe cognitive impairments that they cannot exercise self determinationIn this book Norman Cantor analyzes the legal and moral status of people with profound mental disabilities―those with extreme cognitive impairments that prevent their exercise of medical self determination He proposes a legal and moral framework for surrogate medical decision making on their behalf The issues Cantor explores will be of interest to professionals in law medicine psychology philosophy and ethics as well as to parents guardians and health care providers who face perplexing issues in the context of surrogate medical decision makingThe profoundly mentally disabled are thought by some moral philosophers to lack the minimum cognitive ability for personhood Countering this position Cantor advances both theoretical and practical arguments for according them full legal and moral status He also argues that the concept of intrinsic human dignity should have an integral role in shaping the bounds of surrogate decision making Thus he claims while profoundly mentally disabled persons are not entitled to make their own medical decisions respect for intrinsic human dignity dictates their right to have a conscientious surrogate make medical decisions on their behalf Cantor discusses the criteria that bind such surrogates He asserts contrary to popular wisdom that the best interests of the disabled person are not always the determinative standard the interests of family or others can sometimes be considered Surrogates may even consistent with the intrinsic human dignity standard sometimes authorize tissue donation or participation in nontherapeutic medical research by profoundly disabled persons Intrinsic human dignity limits the occasions for such decisions and dictates close attention to the preferences and feelings of the profoundly disabled persons themselves Cantor also analyzes the underlying philosophical rationale that makes these decision making criteria consistent with law and morals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Norman L. Cantor

PDF Making Medical Decisions for the Profoundly Mentally ï izmirescort.pro